• Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Practice Areas
  • Application
  • Contact
中文
  1. English
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Practice Areas
  • Application
  • Contact
  • 中文
      • Patent

        Patent search, Invention, Utility model, Design, Patent litigations, Patent consulting
      • Trademark

        Trademark Search, Trademark registration, Trademark change, Trademark transfer, Trademark renewal, Trademark licensing
      • Copyright

        Works copyright, Computer software copyright, Copyright licensing, Copyright transfer, Copyright consulting
      • Legal Consulting

        Legal counseling, Intellectual Property Disputes, Economic Disputes, Labor Disputes, Contract Disputes, Construction Disputes, Criminal Proceedings, Traffic Accidents, and other Legal Consulting, Documents writing, etc
      Latest News
      • 20266-26

        Comparative Overview of Substantive Amendments in the Revised PRC Trademark Law

        1. Combating malicious registration and hoarding of trademarks. Previous: Provisions were scattered and lacked targeted measures against malicious hoarding.  Current: A new dedicated chapter has been added, explicitly stipulating that applications "not for use purposes and clearly exceeding normal business needs" shall be refused registration. Summary: Cracking down on "squatting without using" for speculative resale.  Example: A company that operates only in the catering sector files over a thousand trademark applications in unrelated classes (e.g.,clothing, electrical appliances) with the intent to resell at high prices. Under the new law, such filings will be directly rejected. 2. New registrable elements (dynamic marks).  Previous: Only words, graphics, letters, numerals, three-dimensional signs, color combinations, and sounds were registrable.  Current: "Dynamic marks" and combinations thereof have been added. Summary: Moving patterns can now be registered as trademarks.  Example: A unique "animated flip effect" on a short-video app's startup screen, or a specific "headlight flashing rhythm" when a car brand starts up, may now be filed for trademark protection. 3. Severe penalties for deceptive marks and misleading use.  Previous: Penalties for improper use of registered trademarks were relatively lenient.  Current: High fines may be imposed for misleading the public through deceptive marks, and failure to rectify within the prescribed period will lead to direct revocation of the trademark.  Summary: Wordplay or deliberate consumer misleading will result in cancellation.  Example: An enterprise registers the mark "千禾0" but deliberately displays it as "千禾0添加" on product packaging, leading consumers to believe the product is additive-free. Under the new law,such deceptive practices will face heavy fines and possible revocation. 4. Upgraded protection for well-known trademarks (facilitating global expansion).  Previous: Cross-class protection was mainly available for registered well-known marks; the term used was "recognition".  Current: No distinction is made between registered and unregistered marks - both are protected against pre-emptive filings; the term is changed to "confirmation"; and for overseas enforcement, domestic authorities may issue official certificates confirming the mark's well-known status within China.  Summary: Well-known trademark protection becomes more comprehensive, with official backing for overseas litigation.  Example: A renowned domestic time-honored brand, well-known in China but not registered abroad, is pre-emptively registered by a foreign merchant. Now, the domestic trademark office can issue a "confirmation of well-known status in China" to strengthen the brand's case in overseas enforcement proceedings. 5. Ex officio revocation mechanism.  Previous: Revocation for non-use for three consecutive years could only be requested by third parties (typically competitors).  Current: The competent administrative authority (the State Council's trademark office) may ex officio revoke trademarks that are "registered but unused".  Summary: The authority proactively cleans up "zombie marks", without waiting for third-party complaints.  Example: A company registered a trademark a decade ago but has long abandoned its use. Previously, the mark would remain on the register unless challenged. Now, the office will periodically review and actively revoke such marks, freeing resources for genuine users. 6. Stricter regulation of trademark agency industry.  Previous: Penalties for agency misconduct were relatively light, leading to widespread malpractices.  Current: Agencies are required to file for recordal, with clear professional ethics rules; heavier sanctions are imposed for fraudulent solicitation, knowingly assisting in unlawful filings, and other violations.  Summary: Tighter control over "unscrupulous intermediaries" - agencies cannot facilitate clients' illicit activities.  Example: An agency knowingly files a trademark application that copies another's mark, merely to earn fees. Under the new law, both the agency and its responsible employees will face severe penalties. 7. Clarification of online use activities.  Previous: The definition of trademark use on the Internet was unclear.  Current: It is explicitly provided that trademark use carried out through information networks such as the Internet falls within the scope of the law.  Summary: Online trademark use now counts as legally recognized use.  Example: An online store prominently displays its trademark in product descriptions and on livestream studio backdrops - such activities are now statutorily defined as "trademark use" and may serve as evidence to maintain the validity of the registration. 8. Shortened opposition period for enhanced efficiency.  Previous: The opposition period after preliminary approval was 3 months.  Current: The opposition period is shortened to 2 months.  Summary: Accelerating trademark finalization and reducing procedural delays, though rights holders must act more swiftly.  Example: An applicant passes preliminary examination and faces an opposition period reduced from 3 to 2 months. If no opposition is filed, the registration certificate can be obtained one month earlier, enabling faster market entry. However, if a third party discovers a pre-emptive filing, they must file an opposition within the 2-month window, or risk losing the chance to challenge.
        More+
        See Details+
      • 20266-5

        Notice on Adjusting Document Delivery Methods for Madrid International Trademark Non-Use Cancellations

        To further advance the comprehensive digitalization of the "non-use cancellation for three consecutive years" (hereinafter referred to as "non-use cancellation") procedures, enhance the delivery rate of legal documents in Madrid international trademark non-use cancellation cases, and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Madrid international trademark registrants, notice is hereby given regarding adjustments to the delivery methods for certain legal documents in these proceedings: Effective June 5, 2026, the following documents will no longer be delivered directly to the trademark registrant via physical mail. Instead, they will be transmitted as electronic documents to the registrant via the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Notice to Submit Evidence of Use of the Registered Trademark or Statement of Justifiable Grounds for Non-Use; Decision on the Application for Cancellation of the [XXXX] Registered Trademark Due to Three Consecutive Years of Non-Use (issued when the registrant fails to respond upon expiration of the time limit); Closing Notice on the Application for Cancellation of the [XXXX] Registered Trademark Due to Three Consecutive Years of Non-Use. Where a Madrid international trademark registrant has entrusted a trademark agency to handle the response/defense, the delivery method for the relevant decision documents shall remain unchanged.
        More+
        See Details+
      • 20265-22

        2026 Intellectual Property Powerhouse Construction Plan Released with Nine Special Enforcement Campaigns Launched

        On May 16, 2026, the Office of the Inter-Ministerial Joint Conference on Intellectual Property Powerhouse Construction officially released the “2026 Intellectual Property Powerhouse Construction Promotion Plan”. As the fifth year of implementing the “Intellectual Property Powerhouse Construction Outline (2021-2035)”, and a critical node for the conclusion of the “14th Five-Year Plan” and planning of the “15th Five-Year Plan”, this annual “construction blueprint” will have profound impacts on patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, geographical indications, data intellectual property and other fields. Seven Key Task Areas: I. Improving the intellectual property system II. Strengthening intellectual property protection III. Improving the market operation mechanism of intellectual property IV. Enhancing the efficiency of intellectual property services V. Strengthening publicity and education on intellectual property protection VI. Deepening international exchanges and cooperation on intellectual property VII. Strengthening organizational guarantees Nine Special Enforcement Campaigns: “Sword Net 2026” special campaign against online infringement and piracy “Sword Shadow 2026” special campaign for copyright protection of theatrical films Special campaign for juvenile copyright protection season “Guard Intellectual Property” special law enforcement campaign in emerging fields “Guard Intellectual Property” special law enforcement campaign in e-commerce fields “Dragon Soar” special campaign for customs protection of intellectual property Campaign against bad-faith patent applications and malicious trademark registrations Special campaign for geographical indication protection Special campaign for Olympic symbol protection Core Measures Related to SRDI (Specialized, Refinement, Differentiation, Innovation) Enterprises: Patent Examination Green Channel: Provide fast-track examination services for eligible invention patent applications from SRDI SMEs, supporting high-quality development of strategic emerging industries. Trademark Examination Efficiency Improvement: By the end of 2026, stabilize general trademark registration period within 7 months, control opposition examination period within 10 months, and control trademark revocation review case examination period within 7 months. International Cooperation Deepening: Deepen intellectual property cooperation with “Belt and Road” countries and regions, promote the establishment of policy exchange mechanisms among co-construction countries, and explore pathways for international mutual recognition of data intellectual property. Overseas Dispute Response Guidance: Improve the overseas intellectual property dispute response guidance system, establish rapid response mechanisms, and support enterprises going global. Impact on Enterprises: Positive Impact: Improved patent and trademark examination efficiency shortens the protection cycle for enterprise innovation achievements; strengthened overseas rights protection support provides better guarantees for enterprises going global. Compliance Requirements: Bad-faith patent applications and trademark hoarding will face stricter crackdowns, requiring enterprises to strengthen intellectual property compliance management. Opportunity Window: SRDI enterprises can fully utilize fast-track examination channels to accelerate core technology patent layout.
        More+
        See Details+
      • About Us
      • News
      • Practice Areas
      • Application
      • Contact
      2025 Huigang Dongping IP Law Firm All Rights Reserved.  Design By:kingtin
       粤公网安备 44060402001665号   粤公网安备 44060402001666号